A Short History of Progress

a-short-history-of-progressA Short History of Progress by Ronald Wright available @ Amazon.com

What is the difference between our 21st century global civilization, the ancient Sumerians, the Easter Islanders of Cook’s day, empirical Rome, or the Maya civilization.  Answer, not much.   The last four are all societies that had their heyday, become stuck in a paradigm, and then brought ecological disaster on themselves via overpopulation and over exploitation of natural resources.   “Each time history repeats itself, the price goes up”, Wrights quotes from some pertinent graffiti.  The cost this time could be in the billions of souls.

 This a short book 132 pages of actual text with another 68 or so of footnotes at the end.  It is a mad rush through human history exploring the collapse of those civilizations and a couple that have been more sustainable. 

 Wright also explores the traps of progress.  That is mankind becomes so good at hunting he drives his food source into extinction.  Then we become so proficient at an irrigation technology we ruin the land. We become so good at weapons we create bombs that could ruin the whole world.  As a race, he contends, we seem to push every technology to the brink, to our collective woe.

 I read with highlighter in hand.  I had to restrain myself for marking whole long sections.  As it is, the book now has a pink glow.  Several pages have yellow tabs so I can find passages easily again.  One such passage from the book summarizes it for me:

 “The human inability to foresee – or to watch out for – long-range consequences may be inherent to our kind, shaped by the millions of years when we lived from hand to mouth by hunting and gathering.  It may also be little more than a mix of inertia, greed, and foolishness encouraged by the shape of the social pyramid.  The concentration of power at the top of large-scale societies gives the elite a vested interest in the status quo; they continue to prosper in darkening times long after the environment and general populace begin to suffer.”

 I remember as a biology major we studied the boom and bust cycle of animal populations.   It was suggested in class that the human animal could follow the same cycle.  The professor dismissed the idea, but not so Wright.  He sees us at the high point in a few years, then the collapse unless we act now.

 One other passage really struck home with me:  “The idea that the world must be run by the stock market is as mad as any other fundamentalist delusion, Islamic, Christian, or Marxist.”  That tears at the very sand we have our society built on. 

The sheer pace of Wright’s march through history mirrors the author’s urgency about how long we have to act to save our society.  The countdown has already begun.  The question remains, do we have the gumption to take the necessary action.   

The book is at its heart liberal, and rightly so. Any possible solution to forestall the potential social collapse will not be from the top of the pyramid.  They long ago seemed to have forgotten the concept of usufruct; we are just borrowing this planet from our children and grandchildren.  Wright holds out a glimmer of hope, but the candle is flickering.

Don't be shy, reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.